https://personal.ericgoldman.org/bloggers_as_jou/ Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:48:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://personal.ericgoldman.org/bloggers_as_jou/#comment-184 Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:48:41 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/personal/archives/2005/12/bloggers_as_jou.html#comment-184 Well, ranking on a list is one way of determining influence. Another way is to focus on quality, not ranking. For some reason I think that a measure of a blog’s importance (essentially the same thing as influence) is not necessarily in correlation with how high it might be ranked on a list. I know that the quality that comes from both of the Goldman blogs I read makes them pretty influential in my perception.

]]> https://personal.ericgoldman.org/bloggers_as_jou/#comment-185 Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:00:22 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/personal/archives/2005/12/bloggers_as_jou.html#comment-185 That’s very kind of you to say, Evan. However, there are thousands of quality blogs out there. Plus, if a PR agency were trying to process thousands of blogs, it’s very hard to judge quality or influence accurately. But my broader point is that if PR agencies are futzing with small potatoes blogs like mine, they must see a lot of value in the blogosphere. Eric.

]]>