<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why I No Longer Respond to Unsolicited Inquiries About Legal Matters	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://personal.ericgoldman.org/why-i-no-longer-respond-to-unsolicited-inquiries-about-legal-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://personal.ericgoldman.org/why-i-no-longer-respond-to-unsolicited-inquiries-about-legal-matters/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DDavidson		</title>
		<link>https://personal.ericgoldman.org/why-i-no-longer-respond-to-unsolicited-inquiries-about-legal-matters/#comment-2927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DDavidson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/personal/?p=1757#comment-2927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OHNOYOUDIDNT! -- Stupid disqus just ate a rather lengthy comment.

no time to repeat, but the tl;dr was:
-- given the samaritan laws and private protections for unpaid public use of their lands that are common, why aren&#039;t lawyers similarly protected from claims made due to unsolicited, unpaid advice?
-- if boilerplate disclaimers in your responses are insufficient protection, how about a &#039;captcha&#039; sort of script that quarantines messages, and forces people seeking advice to agree that they&#039;re not your client and you&#039;re not their attorney until you decide otherwise.

Throw in a bunch of platitudes about how helpful you were when I asked a question, how helpful a few other fellow bloggers with JD&#039;s were, and that I still appreciate all of that advice, attention and help.  About how this is 21st century pro bono.  And that I hope you figure a way through. 

Sorry to hear about your wife; I wish you the best in unimaginable circumstances.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OHNOYOUDIDNT! &#8212; Stupid disqus just ate a rather lengthy comment.</p>
<p>no time to repeat, but the tl;dr was:<br />
&#8212; given the samaritan laws and private protections for unpaid public use of their lands that are common, why aren&#8217;t lawyers similarly protected from claims made due to unsolicited, unpaid advice?<br />
&#8212; if boilerplate disclaimers in your responses are insufficient protection, how about a &#8216;captcha&#8217; sort of script that quarantines messages, and forces people seeking advice to agree that they&#8217;re not your client and you&#8217;re not their attorney until you decide otherwise.</p>
<p>Throw in a bunch of platitudes about how helpful you were when I asked a question, how helpful a few other fellow bloggers with JD&#8217;s were, and that I still appreciate all of that advice, attention and help.  About how this is 21st century pro bono.  And that I hope you figure a way through. </p>
<p>Sorry to hear about your wife; I wish you the best in unimaginable circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
